AWWA WQTC64005

$14.00

Simulating Chlorine Dioxide-Based Disinfection of Hetch Hetchy Aqueduct Unfiltered Water via Bench-Scale Testing
Conference Proceeding by American Water Works Association, 11/01/2006

Document Format: PDF

Description

MWH’s Applied Research Department (ARD) and SFPUC developed a bench-scale protocolwith the overall objectives of screening the effects of utilizing ClO<sub>2</sub> on the HHA supply(Moccasin Reservoir) not only on disinfection performance, but also on finished water quality,formation of DBPs (chlorite and chlorate), and potential operational issues, such as maintaining atarget chlorine residual. To address the study objectives, an unfiltered water sample was collected from the Moccasinlocation and utilized to conduct bench-scale testing, according to a protocol that identified thefollowing three major tasks. Task 1 consisted of monitoring ClO<sub>2</sub> demand and decay kinetics over a 48-hour period afterthe addition of a specific ClO<sub>2</sub> dose (t=0). During this task ClO<sub>2</sub> residuals, chlorite,chlorate, apparent color and UV<sub>254</sub> (unfiltered) levels were monitored to identify anysignificant trends. At t=5.5 hours, the sample was pH adjusted to 9.2 using lime addition tosimulate the process occurring to the source water at the Rock River location. The effect oflime addition on ClO<sub>2</sub> kinetics was also addressed.Task 2 focused on determining the stoichiometric amount of a quenching agent required toeliminate any residual ClO<sub>2</sub> at t=16 hr (simulation of Tesla Portal location where sodiumhypochlorite is added). The quenching agent initially utilized was calcium thiosulfate(CaS<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>) and the required quenching dose was established via titration following a proceduresimilar to that described in the Standard Methods (Method 4500-CI B. Iodometric Method)(APHA et al., 1998). This method also allowed estimating ClO<sub>2</sub> residual present in thesample.Subsequently, a comparative evaluation of quenching kinetics was performed utilizingsodium sulfite (Na<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>3</sub>). Since the kinetics of the reaction of ClO<sub>2</sub> and Na<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>3</sub> wereexpected to be slower than that with CaS<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>, the system was monitored for 8 hours after theaddition of Na<sub>2SO<sub>3</sub>. Residual ClO<sub>2</sub>, chlorite, and chlorate formation were monitored duringthis period.Task 3 investigated the effects of utilizing extended ClO<sub>2</sub> oxidation (and further quenchingwith CaS<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>) on post-treatment chlorine demand and decay. At t=16 hours (i.e., 16 hoursafter ClO<sub>2</sub> addition), a sample was quenched with a 10% excess of the CaS<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> quenchingdose established in Task 2. This sample was then dosed with sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl)and the decay was subsequently monitored for 8 hours. The effect of ClO<sub>2</sub> treatment on finalchlorine demand is of particular interest, as literature on the utilization of ClO<sub>2</sub> followed bychlorine have reported mixed results. While some studies report a synergy in terms ofreduced formation of chlorinated DBPs and no significant reduction in disinfectioncapabilities from this combined process (Narkis et al., 1995), other studies report reduceddisinfection ability, particularly for Cryptosporidium control (Corona-Vasquez et al., 2002). Includes 11 references, table, figures.

Product Details

Edition:
Vol. – No.
Published:
11/01/2006
Number of Pages:
11
File Size:
1 file , 420 KB
Note:
This product is unavailable in Ukraine, Russia, Belarus